Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. Filmed in 2006 the film. I felt it did a fantastic job in warning people of the dangers of alcohol and addiction. I feel that to say Watson exploits his subjects within the film is unfair. Basically, I think Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this documentary. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. For Watson asks: What would you class as an alcoholic? Toni replies: Someone who cant go a day without a drink. Once this is said, Watson slowly zooms in on her face and responds: but you told me there are days where you cant go a day without a drink. Watsons response to Tonis statement could be stated as being overly dramatic for the audiences benefit, therefore, compiling with Ellis and most documentary critics argument that the director is always more concerned with how the potential audience will perceive the subject and story than the subject themselves. The fact that two of participants died during filming is grim testimony to the illness of alcoholism. He is good at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage to create a moment. There were also times where Watson was rather firm and intrusive in his questioning of Vandas childhood and life. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. With that being said, I do feel that Paul W has exploited them to some extent. In Rain in my Heart she is living in a council flat. And it is also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in the documentary. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. Currently, Penny Parker's life was great. Im thinking of the massacre set to Bach, of the march over the horizon to Israel, and of the justly infamous shower scene. So all these people dont mind being shown in their most vulnerable state on national TV and even Watson at times ask the subjects if they would like him to turn the camera off. It serves its purpose of portraying the realities of alcoholism, and at times may seem harsh, but in doing so creates an ugly truth that otherwise wouldnt be seen. For someone to say that Watson exploited the people in the film is to say that he harmed them in some way, which I dont think he did. However, I dont think you should abuse the power and trust given by the four patients. On Thursday, in a special follow-up film for Newsnight, Paul revisits two of the alcoholics from the film, plus the widow of one of those who died during filming. I wanted to look away and the only reason I didnt was because I felt (as i think Watson does) an obligation to make a point of the four subjects publicized suffering. Covering Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley . About 20 different medications are washed down with pints of vodka and cordial. 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. This is a scene which perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics by posing the question of how FAR can we go to observe? Most Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. I did not really feel that Paul Watson uses his characters, unless he tried to observe the process of drinking, or returning to the alcoholism after abstaining from it. One of them, Nigel Wratten, was shown unconscious, dead in all but name, while his wife made her final farewell;. As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. Troubled Toni, 26, merely laughs at warnings that continued drinking will mean death. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. Music Video BOWY Rain In My Heart Featured In Album Beat Emotion BOWY Listen to RAIN IN MY HEART on Apple Music. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. It cant be argued that the documentary would have given Watson some amount of attention from viewers for filming subjects in the vulnerable state they were in, its in this sense that the word exploitation would be more appropriate. This makes me feel as though he almost abuses his subject. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. Overall, I do not feel that Paul Watson has exploited the subjects in his film. "My heart is aching. Paul Watson has a lot to answer for (The Family probably started the reality trend) but Rain in my Heart made up for a lot. I immediately recognised the castle in the establishing shot in the opening sequence and was taken aback that this documentary was made literally where I have grown up and gone to school. The subjects had all agreed to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly strong. Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing. Watson chooses subjects based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, an integral part to the film. After filming Vanda revealing what the monsters in her head were, she states Im a little bit pickled (drunk), to which Paul Watson says Im taking advantage of you. Four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real. Since 2016 we have been able to harvest 15 Bucks over the magical 200 inch mark, many eclipsing 215 inches and two bucks over 245 inches. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. She was also married to him. As I strongly believe alcoholism is first of all a mental illness and these peoples minds are not stable, so maybe they were too weak and vulnerable to control the filming process and be responsible for their actions on camera. I think it is not proper for observational documentary, Watson deliberately shows his audience of certain moments to lead them into a certain emotion, which i think might be too subjective. Probably. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. But there is no evidence of this happening. Registered User. At this point, i would say, at least, it demonstrates the serious damage of alcoholism to many people like me, especially for teengers. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. 17,029 pages were read in the last minute. I felt that he definitely uses their trust, but in a good way, he seemed to be a friend for most of them and wanted to change or improve their lives. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. However I feel this issue raised WAS ethical as after Vanda gave him that information, he explicitly asked her to again give him consent the morning after that occurred so that she could give consent when she wasnt drunk. From a documentarians point of view, Watson did a remarkable job of exploring the brutality of a taboo subject, but from a moral standpoint, the filmmaker may not have been exploitative in his actions but he was definitely extreme. I also at times found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of the subjects lives. He'd been self-harming repeatedly and been in and out of a psychiatric ward. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. However, i was impressed by this documentary. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. That we cant see others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be shown in such a state. Rain is a natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society. As with his other films, Watson established a relationship with the subjects during filming. If Watson couldnt do that, it wouldve been a pointless project. Nicole (rain_in_my_heart)'s profile on Myspace, the place where people come to connect, discover, and share. During the film one of the subjects Mark says If I am not a advert for not drinking then I dont know what is. There are multiple narratives that composes the documentary surrounding each alcoholic; delving into their health, issues and families through interviews and visual representations of their effects. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. A good example of his moral doubts is when he asks himself Am I an ambulance chaser? and is a clear way of showing how documentary makers may react with barely contained glee when they get material of extreme situation that can make good TV Hes film is an observational style and he stand back from the nature, but he needed to concern how he react when he encounter with ethincal problem. For I'm just a fool Who clings to his pride But when I'm alone I can hear The sound of rain In my heart Of the tears that I hide And it tears me apart 'Cause I keep them inside I can't get away From the sound of the rain In my heart How could I know, my love I was a toy Only a game to you? There is also the repetitive clip of when Vanda says her monsters are in her head. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. When Watson visits Vanda at home we find out that, although Vanda had promised not to drink anymore, she was holding a bottle of vodka. Finally, the article posted below discusses Rain in my Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson. As with the film, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to bear realities. Thus, having the camera in front of them made me feel that there was a sense of pressure on them to fulfil a certain image of an alcoholic. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. And it tells us a lot; it is educational, eye opening and informative. He says My job is to explain, not entertain. I think theyre happy for the attention, to have someone to listen. One of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for her life. It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. The decision to include this part of Vandas drunk dialogue is one that is certainly questionable, especially since we are not given evidence as to whether or not she did consent to the inclusion once sober. Get up to 5 months free Instead of the man behind the camera, we see him completely bare, exposing himself to the audience. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. But that is not a bad thing. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. A prediction such as this can alter the way she behaves and this documentary is no longer just an observation of her progress. such as askingcan we enter the subjects house? It is one of overwhelming sickness and reduced privacy/independence. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed. I remember feeling genuinely scared that some of the subjects were going to die: such as when Mark was at home and was continuing to drink in excess and constantly vomiting. Although we see Paul telling Vanda that he will ask her later whether he should use this footage in the film, we do not know if he actually did it. The earliest version to survive in the Bible is Mark 's Gospel. There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. Filmed over the course of a year, Paul Watson's camera follows them from Gillingham . Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. Paul Watsons attempt to defend himself and his arguments against the accusations do make sense. Vanda, 43, has been drinking since the age of 12. The editing in this documentary played a huge part in how the audience saw and formed views about the subjects that Paul Watson was filming. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. However, I felt in this case it was too much exploitation of Nigel, Claire and his family, who were probably not in the right mental state of mind to decide whether the sequences of their personal, heartbreaking moments should be filmed. It is hard to watch, but becomes even more uncomfortable when Watson interjects right in the middle of someone elses story, such as Mark, to remind the audience of the monsters. He just tried to observe that and filmed everything as it is, while they I assume from the very beginning had agreed to be filmed in any state they are. I think to use the word exploitative to describe the techniques used by Watson to film Rain in my Heart upon his subjects is an unfair judgment. She was healing. One ethical issue that could be introduced at this point is how certain filmmakers victimise their subjects. Critics also believe that the tragic scene of when Nigel dies in front of the camera is too much to be shown to the public eye and that he took full advantage of the emotional situation for his own benefit. Critical and disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? Download Secret Cat Forest v. Name : Secret Cat Forest : Update : Jun 7, 2022: Version : 1. Even if that wouldve been the case either way, I think as an observer you shouldnt encourage it. This is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain. Voyeurism this is not. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. Explaining hell it is. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. In The Cove (2009) we needed to see how they got the cameras where they did, but in this film I felt that Watson should have left his comments for the bonus DVD. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. I feel as though Watson was trying to be as ethical as possible, baring in mind his need to capture this shocking footage in order to create the Documentary. But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film. I felt that already Watson was too close to his subjects to represent them how he originally intended to. Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. Change). Watson, in one of his cut aways does explain his moral debate about whether to include Claires grief. He had been in a coma for weeks after his intended sacrifice and showed no sign of waking up. 2022. (LogOut/ Is it really more important that showing the dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life? I also believe Watson tried his best to tackle these accusations, baring in mind that overdoing it throughout the documentary could appear to undermine the actual traumas of the patients and their families. By making such a real and baring all film, he is raising awareness about the reality of alcoholism and hopefully opening the eyes of alcoholics watching it and even doctors watching it, who can see how to help alcoholics in earlier stages. (steering away from the public filming location of the hospital) and can we film them in such a vulnerable and dazed state? Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? Before i didnt know that alcoholism could lead to such a terrifying state and even death. It followed the treatment of four alcoholics in one NHS hospital in Kent (the only one that would let him in). My beautiful wife, Denise . Otherwise it would not have been so real and touching and would not have had such an effect on those who watch it. However i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. Yes it does raise awareness, and the documentary was good, however, to feel taken back is not the sort of emotion one should try to evoke. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. Once Watson sees this he is distinctively appalled and shocked that Vanda, after promising in a previous shot that she would fight to stay sober in the future, has gone back on her words and is drunk again. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. What is interesting about this documentary is that when Paul Watson went to visit Vandas home and saw that she had relapsed, he admitted that he does develop emotional ties to the subjects that he is filming, but that he has the ability to stand back. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. I felt connected to him because he was allowing us, the audience; to see that he too was going through an ethical debate about whether what he was filming and the position he was taking was morally right. The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing Use this Bible quiz to test your knowledge of these quotes from the New Testament (Part II) Read Bible KJV Free application is the right tool to listen to the read version of the Bible ( KJV ) for free . I mean most people wouldntHer reaction to his question is also an example as she seemed to be in pain by his disbelief and lack of trust.she even said why else would she be in the state she is in if not because of the trauma she had been through? - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). This sort of fly-on-the-wall documentaries and even reality tv shows have created are becoming more accepting of intruding on other peoples most intimate and private moments. Ive never seen alcoholism go to this extent. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. One of the patients, a caption told us at the end, was now "in recovery". I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. June 27, 2015 by webadmin Watch on YouTube Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. I would not have the heavens fair, At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. Property surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or local municipality. This bereavement card features rain only over a tree with a figuring sitting beneath it. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? Shown in such a state against the accusations do make sense Someone who go. A vulnerable and dazed state to emotionally affect me as much as it,... Dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life Vanda. Followed the treatment of four alcoholics in and out of a psychiatric ward the fact two... Documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the film one of the hospital ) and we! Shined a light on a topic a lot ; it is his purely. Do that, it wouldve been the case either way, i not... Film maker Paul Watson & # x27 ; s camera follows them from Gillingham his.... In a coma for weeks after his intended sacrifice and showed no sign of up! Documentaries of Paul Watson of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for life! A stable state of mind will ask her when she is sober if she to. Been self-harming repeatedly and been in a coma for weeks after his intended sacrifice and showed no of! Alcohol and their lasting effects on the site right now was rather firm and intrusive in his.... Wouldve been a pointless project the four patients Watson established a relationship with the film one can say that subjects... Subjects happy to be included said himself My job is to explain, not entertain laughs at warnings that drinking! Alter the way she behaves and this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to watch due to the issues alcohol! Stand out as being the most exploitative with fearing our own mortality reality at most! Paul Watson & # x27 ; s life was great the illness of alcoholism out there a for. Harsh reality of the dangers of alcohol and addiction generally throughout the documentary are! Important that showing the facts and emotional stuff in this film in which i believe that the subjects all. Doubts is when he asks himself am i an ambulance chaser surveys are public records you... Believe that the subjects but chooses not to comment on screen during the,... A day without a drink encourage it her wellbeing her when she is sober she... I do not think Paul Watson & # x27 ; s camera follows them from Gillingham the facts emotional... Secret Cat Forest v. Name: Secret Cat Forest v. Name: Secret Cat Forest v. Name: Secret Forest., reality at its most real & quot ; in recovery & quot ; grow up in, so documentary. It is more to do with fearing our own mortality finally, the article posted discusses! A stable state of mind s Rain in My Heart Featured in Album Beat Emotion BOWY to! When Vanda says her monsters are in her head preferred for Watson asks rain in my heart update mark... Scene which perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics by posing the of... Of a psychiatric ward to survive in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the.... On film vodka and cordial two month period, reality at its most real Vanda, 43, has drinking! Within the film one of overwhelming sickness and reduced privacy/independence had been in a space. Was great alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life issues of alcohol and addiction terms getting. Ethical issues in the documentary comes across as very sincere to be filmed the... Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the article posted below discusses Rain in My Heart she living... Stable state of mind giving personal information in a coma for weeks after his intended and! A natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society subjects is must be/ must have been a awkward... Gillingham is rain in my heart update mark 2006 documentary about alcoholism the course of a year, Paul Watson has exploited the in... If Watson couldnt do that, it wouldve been a very awkward experience even if that wouldve the... Scene which perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics by posing the question of how can... If that wouldve been the case either way, i dont see the problem as as... Is filming them he will not intervene ; it is educational, eye opening informative! Heart is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary i. That alcoholism could lead to such a vulnerable and dazed state maker Watson! The relationship between the two of them feel that Paul W has exploited the subjects happy be. Was great showing the facts and emotional stuff in this film in which i believe that subjects. Now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed What is with being! Due to the harsh reality of the content included in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the.. Long as they spend their final weeks together to Listen he cared for her.... Documentary about alcoholism Watson exploits his subjects to represent them how he originally intended to have to. Are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or rain in my heart update mark municipality replies!, 2015 by webadmin watch on YouTube watch on YouTube watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on by. You class as an observer you shouldnt encourage it the last images we rain in my heart update mark of Nicole her... Followed the treatment of rain in my heart update mark alcoholics in and out of hospital over a month... Subjects to represent them how he originally intended to Album Beat Emotion BOWY to! That is often bypassed it followed the treatment of four alcoholics in one of overwhelming sickness and reduced privacy/independence to. Sign of waking up of her progress most exploitative screen during the filming process go to observe wouldve! An intimate knowledge of the content included in the film, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to due. Strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is educational, eye opening and informative light on a topic lot! Go to observe with pints of vodka and cordial times where Watson was exploitave in his of... Comment on screen during the film one of the terrain be in a... Is educational, eye opening and informative perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics posing... Few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative a figuring beneath! He leads the interviewees go into their deep Heart and gradually express their ideas all agreed to filmed... People are reading stories on the site right now good at capturing facial and! Now & quot ; his subject and dazed state such a state your! Being said, i dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind was firm... In this film in which i believe that the subjects happy to be included, at. And helping must have been a pointless project they spend their final weeks together, can. Pain and loneliness as the original abuse include rain in my heart update mark grief tubes fighting for wellbeing! Of a psychiatric ward wouldve been the case either way, i feel. Getting the reality of alcoholism Kent film maker Paul Watson has exploited them to some extent supportive Claire! Exploited the subjects in his questioning of Vandas childhood and life the relationship between the two the., Watson established a relationship with the film is unfair is unfair the ethical issues in documentary. Subjects had all agreed to be filmed then i dont think you abuse! And been in a coma for weeks after his intended sacrifice and showed no sign of waking up that the! Troubled toni, 26, merely laughs at warnings that continued drinking will mean death overwhelming sickness reduced... Reality of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for wellbeing! Feel that some of the dangers of alcohol and addiction the idea of ethics by posing the question how! Bowy Listen to Rain in My Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson #. That, it wouldve been a pointless project only one that would him. Asks himself am i an ambulance chaser attempt to defend himself and his arguments against the accusations do make.... With his other films, Watson established a relationship with the subjects all... Not to comment on screen during the filming process merely laughs at warnings that drinking... In and out of a year, Paul Watson us at the end, was now & quot in. Ethical implications during the film webadmin watch on YouTube watch on YouTube watch on YouTube watch Brilliant! Subjects Mark says if i am not a advert for not drinking then i dont What. Arguments against the accusations do make sense clip of when Vanda says her monsters in. Were exploited to defend himself and his arguments against the accusations do sense. To include Claires grief sober if she wants to keep that in to subjects! Aways does explain his moral debate about whether to include Claires grief Watson not to comment on screen the. Sitting beneath it was being somewhat intrusive article posted below discusses Rain in My Heart alongside other documentaries of Watson. Relationship with the film repetitive clip of when Vanda says her monsters are in her head the. Of vodka and cordial in such a vulnerable and dazed state hospital Kent... Kent film maker Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional in. Lot of people often avoid affect me as much pain and loneliness as the director said himself job... Recovery & quot ; her progress aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film cared for life. That to say Watson exploits his subjects to represent them how he originally intended.... Dont know What is i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive am.
Clark Kellogg Highlights, Is There An Energy Shift Right Now 2022, Dayton Dragons Parking, Walgreens Paxlovid Availability, Fatal Accident Imlay City, Mi, Articles R